Civil Code Insurance & Defects
Volunteer Director Liability Protection
Chapter 9 · Insurance and Liability
Text current as of 2026-07-07 · Last amended by AB 1412, eff. 2018-01-01
The code says CIV §5800
(a) A volunteer officer or volunteer director described in subdivision (e) of an association that manages a common interest development that is residential or mixed use shall not be personally liable in excess of the coverage of insurance specified in paragraph (4) to any person who suffers injury, including, but not limited to, bodily injury, emotional distress, wrongful death, or property damage or loss as a result of
the tortious act or omission of the volunteer officer or volunteer director if all of the following criteria are met:
(1) The act or omission was performed within the scope of the officer’s or director’s association duties.
(2) The act or omission was performed in good faith.
(3) The act or omission was not willful, wanton, or grossly negligent.
(4) The association maintained and had in effect at the time the act or omission occurred and at the time a claim is made one or more policies of insurance that shall include coverage for (A) general liability of the association and (B) individual liability of officers and directors of the association for negligent acts or omissions in that capacity; provided that both types of coverage are in the following
minimum amounts:
(A) At least five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) if the common interest development consists of 100 or fewer separate interests.
(B) At least one million dollars ($1,000,000) if the common interest development consists of more than 100 separate interests.
(b) The payment of actual expenses incurred by a director or officer in the execution of the duties of that position does not affect the director’s or officer’s status as a volunteer within the meaning of this section.
(c) An officer or director who at the time of the act or omission was a declarant, or who received either direct or indirect compensation as an employee from the declarant, or from a financial institution that purchased a separate interest at a judicial or
nonjudicial foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust on real property, is not a volunteer for the purposes of this section.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the liability of the association for its negligent act or omission or for any negligent act or omission of an officer or director of the association.
(e) This section shall only apply to a volunteer officer or director who is a tenant of a residential separate interest in the common interest development or is an owner of no more than two separate interests and whose ownership in the common interest development consists exclusively of residential separate interests.
(f) (1) For purposes of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a), the scope of the officer’s or director’s association duties shall include, but shall not be
limited to, both of the following decisions:
(A) Whether to conduct an investigation of the common interest development for latent deficiencies prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
(B) Whether to commence a civil action against the builder for defects in design or construction.
(2) It is the intent of the Legislature that this section clarify the scope of association duties to which the protections against personal liability in this section apply. It is not the intent of the Legislature that these clarifications be construed to expand, or limit, the fiduciary duties owed by the directors or officers.
(Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 278, Sec. 2. (AB 1412) Effective January 1, 2018.)
How courts have read this
Editorial summaries — not the court’s words.
- Ruoff v. Harbor Creek Community Assn. 10 Cal. App. 4th 1624 · 1992 Condo owners stay liable for common-area torts despite delegating to the HOA.
- Palm Springs Villas II Homeowners Ass'n v. Parth 248 Cal. App. 4th 268 · 2016 The business judgment rule protects only directors who stay reasonably informed.
mentioned in passing
Decided under the former numbering
- Brown v. Professional Community Management, Inc. 127 Cal. App. 4th 532 · 2005 · as former §1365.7 The fee-cost limit binds associations, not their managing agents.
- Franklin v. Marie Antoinette Condominium Owners Ass'n 19 Cal. App. 4th 824 · 1993 · as former §1365.7 CC&R exculpatory clauses can bar damage claims against a nonnegligent association.
Every decision listed was decided before the current text (eff. 2018-01-01, AB 1412).