Civil Code Rules & Governing Documents
Reducing the Vote to Amend CC&Rs
Chapter 3 · Governing Documents · Declaration
Text current as of 2026-07-07 · Last amended by AB 805, eff. 2014-01-01
The code says CIV §4275
(a) If in order to amend a declaration, the declaration requires members having more than 50 percent of the votes in the association, in a single class voting structure, or members having more than 50 percent of the votes in more than one class in a voting structure with more than one class, to vote in favor of the amendment, the association, or any member, may petition the superior court of the county in which the common interest development is located for an
order reducing the percentage of the affirmative votes necessary for such an amendment. The petition shall describe the effort that has been made to solicit approval of the association members in the manner provided in the declaration, the number of affirmative and negative votes actually received, the number or percentage of affirmative votes required to effect the amendment in accordance with the existing declaration, and other matters the petitioner considers relevant to the court’s determination. The petition shall also contain, as exhibits thereto, copies of all of the following:
(1) The governing documents.
(2) A complete text of the amendment.
(3) Copies of any notice and solicitation materials utilized in the solicitation of member approvals.
(4) A short explanation of the reason for the amendment.
(5) Any other documentation relevant to the court’s determination.
(b) Upon filing the petition, the court shall set the matter for hearing and issue an ex parte order setting forth the manner in which notice shall be given.
(c) The court may, but shall not be required to, grant the petition if it finds all of the following:
(1) The petitioner has given not less than 15 days written notice of the court hearing to all members of the association, to any mortgagee of a mortgage or beneficiary of a deed of trust who is entitled to notice under the terms of the declaration, and to the city, county, or city and county in which the common interest development is located that is entitled to
notice under the terms of the declaration.
(2) Balloting on the proposed amendment was conducted in accordance with the governing documents, this act, and any other applicable law.
(3) A reasonably diligent effort was made to permit all eligible members to vote on the proposed amendment.
(4) Members having more than 50 percent of the votes, in a single class voting structure, voted in favor of the amendment. In a voting structure with more than one class, where the declaration requires a majority of more than one class to vote in favor of the amendment, members having more than 50 percent of the votes of each class required by the declaration to vote in favor of the amendment voted in favor of the amendment.
(5) The amendment is reasonable.
(6) Granting the petition is not improper for any reason stated in subdivision (e).
(d) If the court makes the findings required by subdivision (c), any order issued pursuant to this section may confirm the amendment as being validly approved on the basis of the affirmative votes actually received during the balloting period or the order may dispense with any requirement relating to quorums or to the number or percentage of votes needed for approval of the amendment that would otherwise exist under the governing documents.
(e) Subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, notwithstanding, the court shall not be empowered by this section to approve any amendment to the declaration that:
(1) Would change provisions in the declaration requiring the approval of members
having more than 50 percent of the votes in more than one class to vote in favor of an amendment, unless members having more than 50 percent of the votes in each affected class approved the amendment.
(2) Would eliminate any special rights, preferences, or privileges designated in the declaration as belonging to the declarant, without the consent of the declarant.
(3) Would impair the security interest of a mortgagee of a mortgage or the beneficiary of a deed of trust without the approval of the percentage of the mortgagees and beneficiaries specified in the declaration, if the declaration requires the approval of a specified percentage of the mortgagees and beneficiaries.
(f) An amendment is not effective pursuant to this section until the court order and amendment have been recorded in every county in which a
portion of the common interest development is located. The amendment may be acknowledged by, and the court order and amendment may be recorded by, any person designated in the declaration or by the association for that purpose, or if no one is designated for that purpose, by the president of the association. Upon recordation of the amendment and court order, the declaration, as amended in accordance with this section, shall have the same force and effect as if the amendment were adopted in compliance with every requirement imposed by the governing documents.
(g) Within a reasonable time after the amendment is recorded the association shall deliver to each member, by individual delivery, pursuant to Section 4040, a copy of the amendment, together with a statement that the amendment has been recorded.
(Added by Stats. 2012, Ch. 180, Sec. 2. (AB 805) Effective January 1, 2013. Operative January 1, 2014, by Sec. 3 of Ch. 180.)
In plain English
Editorial summary — not the statute’s text.
When member apathy makes it impossible to hit the CC&R amendment threshold, the association can ask a court to lower the bar — but only after running a proper, good-faith election first.
What this means for you
Editorial summary — not the statute’s text.
- Exhaust a real membership vote before considering a court petition.
- Document turnout and outreach — the court will scrutinize your effort.
- Budget for legal counsel; this is a court process, not a board action.
How courts have read this
Editorial summaries — not the court’s words.
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC 55 Cal. 4th 223 · 2012 Developer-drafted arbitration covenants in recorded CC&Rs bind the association.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Orchard Estate Homes, Inc. v. Orchard Homeowner Alliance 32 Cal. App. 5th 471 · 2019 Voter apathy is not required to court-reduce a CC&R supermajority.
central to this opinion — cited 14×
- Quail Lakes Owners Ass'n v. Kozina 204 Cal. App. 4th 1132 · 2012 An objector cannot assert other homeowners' rights to block a vote-reduction order.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Fourth La Costa Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Seith 159 Cal.App.4th 563 · 2008 Courts can lower the CC&R amendment threshold after a failed good-faith vote.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Mission Shores Assn. v. Pheil 166 Cal. App. 4th 789 · 2008 Courts may lower the vote threshold to amend CC&Rs.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Peak Investments v. South Peak Homeowners Ass'n 140 Cal. App. 4th 1363 · 2006 A court may cut a CC&R supermajority only after a true majority of all owners approves.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Blue Lagoon Community Assn. v. Mitchell 55 Cal. App. 4th 472 · 1997 Objectors who defeat a vote-reduction petition get no attorney fees.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Ruffier v. Volcano Hills Road Maintenance Assn. 2026 A board cannot raise regular assessments without member approval or budget compliance.
cited 3×
- Tract 19051 Homeowners Assn. v. Kemp 60 Cal. 4th 1135 · 2015 Prevailing-party fees apply even when the development is not a CID.
mentioned in passing
Decided under the former numbering
- Villa De Las Palmas Homeowners Ass'n v. Terifaj 33 Cal. 4th 73 · 2004 · as former §1356 Recorded CC&R amendments bind all owners, including existing ones.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn. 8 Cal.4th 361 · 1994 · as former §1356 Recorded CC&R restrictions are presumed valid and enforceable.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Wittenburg v. Beachwalk Homeowners Ass'n 217 Cal.App.4th 654 · 2013 · as former §1356 Equal access to association media is required in contested elections.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- Kaplan v. Fairway Oaks Homeowners Ass'n 98 Cal. App. 4th 715 · 2002 · as former §1356 Election challenges enforcing the bylaws carry prevailing-party attorney fees.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)
- B.C.E. Development, Inc. v. Smith 215 Cal. App. 3d 1142 · 1989 · as former §1356 Declarants can enforce CC&Rs without owning land when the declaration so provides.
decided before the current text (eff. 2014-01-01, AB 805)